Given that users prefer redress mechanisms to be independent, what Essay

Given that users prefer redress mechanisms to be independent, what justifications explain why some parts of redress mechanism are independent and others are not - Essay Example A good example is the tribunals that are managed by independent tribunals that automatically have to be independent. This is for the reason that they function in a quasi-judicial approach that needs no influence from other forces. These tribunals would, therefore, make it easier for implementation of policies of the tribunals. The Ombudsmen services are yet other independent bodies2. They are run under the leadership of independent Ombudsmen, mostly referred to as commissioners. These bodies need to be independent for the reason that they are charged with the responsibility of investigating various complaints from the citizens. In the case of poor administration, or even offering of poor services to the citizens, these organizations ought to operate independently, if the results have to be free and fair. The Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman Offices are the most common in

Constitutional Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Constitutional - Research Paper Example However, it is observed that the Fourth Amendment has been a victim of different controversies and is regarded as an issue by the US Constitution making authorities and a few other elements. To address this issue, this paper aims to provide a clear explanation and solution. Moreover, to evidence and balance the theory, different federal statues and pending cases on the issue will also be discussed and highlighted. The paper will also discuss reasons for the growing controversies behind the chosen topic followed by a Social Policy and its implementation. Contextual Background to the Issue: The US citizens who have been a victim of the ‘freedom vs. security’ debate has suffered a lot. It has been possible because of the Fourth Amendment that the people can find themselves safe and that they will never be violated. Their security in the US society was assured and protected by this law in the US constitution (Gonzales, 2007). Background (Fourth Amendment): Due to the increas e in the Injunctions of Assistance and general warrants in the late 17th century many elements; citizens, authorities, and groups strongly objected the process and as a consequence the Fourth Amendment was written and compiled. ... 4th Amendment: â€Å"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized†. It was before and without this law, that people felt insecure and did not have any assertion or right over property, security, or privacy. Incidents have been noticed in which Army Marshals and other officers have entered the homes and have taken different evidences which can be used for trial in the court or to help make an arrest (Fradin, 2007). However, a number of controversies have been noticed in the past few years, 4th amendment remains one of the strongest amendment from citizen point of view. The 4th Amendment was never appreciated by the FBI and other agencies working for the security of the State. The law had been bre ached in the Bush era and it is being violated again in the present era of President Obama. The Obama administration requested their supporters in the Congress to pass a legislation that will allow the federal agents to continue their search and march without any barrier and through the 4th Amendment. This is to ensure that they get all the private information of all the citizens residing in their country (Smith, 2010). The 4th Amendment which ensures the individual’s right to be left alone and with their security and privacy is again at stake by the Federal agents in the country. The officers want to make the system more easy and through for them so that they can gather digital information. It was witnessed and revealed in the past when the Bush government was exposed that they had been